This column will be my last of both the academic year and my time here at the College of William and Mary. While devoting time to journalism may have been a poor career choice given the slow and painful death of the American newspaper, I doubt there was a better time in the recent history of the College to closely monitor the news and events that most concerned the institution and its community.
The historic events of the past few years have deeply affected the College. I was first brought into this community with then-President Gene Nichol. Some years later, though no surprise to me or anyone else who had been paying attention, I watched as he resigned. The community caught election fever last fall, witnessing the inauguration of the nation’s first black president. This paved the road for a bunch of out-of-touch goofs to throw a Colonial Tea Party, which, as a Massachusetts resident, was a tad insulting. More recently, we watched the first Tribe Football player since Darren Sharper ’96 get accepted into the NFL draft, and I’m looking forward to watching Derek Cox ’09 pick off passes in a Jacksonville Jaguars uniform soon.
During all my time here, the thing that I’ve enjoyed the most — besides Mug Night — has been the College’s unwavering commitment to the traditions and idealism of its earliest graduates. In the final analysis, the College still fulfills the ideal of quality education once espoused by Thomas Jefferson (class of 1762) and his contemporaries. There may be a finer academic institution of undergraduate learning in the country, but it can’t be by much.
Yet, for all of the College’s adherence to tradition and academic excellence, many people believe that the College struggles to provide the kind of healthy social experience that is both necessary for a well-rounded education and for attracting prospective students. Simply put, the College’s reputation is that it is no fun.
I happen to take issue with this in two ways. First, I’ve found that college is what you make of it. Anyone can have fun here, and campus groups do a great job of hosting events for the entire campus community. If students complain that they’re not having fun, it is either because they are a chemistry major or they are simply not trying hard enough.
Second, the City of Williamsburg is often a hindrance to student life. When you have professors and city residents spying on students and recording license plates, or when a Saturday night concert on campus is cut short and forced to exclude all profanity, you know you’re dealing with people that are off their rockers — literally.
But there is also a certain logic to this argument that cannot be ignored. I’ve long been a critic of the College’s alcohol policy, which most people acknowledge has pushed the social life off campus, causing clashes with city residents, drunk driving, and generally endangering student safety. It seems now that President Taylor Reveley is amenable to examining the existing policies, along with the current Greek housing problem, as on-campus social life, for better or for worse, has long been centered around the Units.
In order for any productive, reasonable changes to be made, however, it may be necessary to replace certain administrators who have long been advocates, if not architects, of the current policy. The College and the Board of Visitors should not be afraid to make judgments about campus officials who are doing more harm than good to the school and its students — they certainly made such judgments about Nichol. While these officials may be convinced that new policies are needed, for years their refusal to compromise makes this unlikely.
Soon, Reveley will announce the next vice president for student affairs. Having paid relatively close attention to this process, I’m very excited to hear the announcement. All candidates sound great.
Right now, the College stands at an important juncture and I’m not even positive that the next VPSA understands how hard his or her job will be. Naturally, Reveley must focus on fundraising, which is our only chance of funding the construction of new dorms to house more students, or developing a new arts complex on new campus. I’m optimistic that when the nation rebounds from the recession, the College will move forward with confidence.
At the same time, the new office of Student Affairs office must hit the ground running. All they have to do is figure out a new mascot (Ebirt), do something about the alcohol policy (fix it), help address Williamsburg’s open discrimination policy (free pancakes for everyone?), try to keep at least a few of the fraternities on campus (too late), and increase the campus’s diversity (get some). Have fun.
E-mail Alexander Ely at anelyx@wm.edu.


4 Comments
Alexander views the Tea
Alexander views the Tea Parties as unnecessary and the work of “out of touch goofs.” Glad to know that Mr. Ely views the biggest political activism event on campus(over 500 people, including 2 state delegates, a state senator, and a US Representative) in recent memory to be the work of extremists and the unregenerate. Then again though, conservatives were involved so the movement must be steeped in some kind of veiled racism, sexism, or elitism. Alexander must find a government that has ramped up $6000 more in additional debt PER PERSON in the six months of the Obama administration completely acceptable and in the right. We now stand at a national debt level of over 12 trillion dollars and growing rapidly. This is not just Obama’s fault, and the Tea Party never said or implied that it was, but the current level of spending and the increase in the scope of the federal government invoked by this administration this quickly caused this massive show of disapproval in the form of Tea Parties to come about. Both parties in Washington have abandoned the principles of limited government and any notion of fiscal responsibility, and the Tea Party’s intention was to provide a vehicle for the citizens of this nation to speak up and tell their elected officials that the direction Washington is going is unacceptable.
If Mr. Ely approves of a government that is engaging in taxation without representation by putting the future generations of its people into massive amounts of debt that they will be forced to pay off in exchange for massive short term spending programs that have done little or nothing to help the economy, I believe that it is he who is out of touch. When all of this hits the fan, I hope Mr. Ely will happily pay the share of us “goofs” because it is people like him that has enabled and applauded the biggest blows to our individual freedom and our future economic prosperity of our time to take place.
Not that this should become
Not that this should become the main topic of discussion, but it was always my understanding that the “Tea Party” was about out-of-control government spending, and not the fact that Obama won the presidential election. I was at the Tea Party, and it had its share of bigots and lunes, but it was also full of people (some of whom do not even identify as conservative) genuinely concerned about the federal government’s rapid accumulation of debt.
Apart from that, I’m in agreement with the author’s notes on campus social life. Town and gown relationships are falling apart, and the Town is mostly to blame for it. I sincerely hope that future classes at W&M can help forge a new path for Williamsburg and the College. The status quo is actually impeding a normal, healthy social campus, and it may be discouraging prospective students from enrolling here. Furthermore, residential regulations force many students into an inconvenient commute to a campus that seeks to become more cohesive and contained.
Good luck to all of you students in fixing this. You’ll need it.
Alexander: Maybe after you
Alexander:
Maybe after you leave the hallowed halls of college, and work a few years, you’ll better understand the “bunch of out-of-touch goofs (that) throw a Colonial Tea Party”.
Good luck to you in your future,
Wayne
Alex, Good article,
Alex,
Good article, particularly with respect to the fact the College’s scene is what you make of it. I had my fair share of fun and, just to be fair, some of the hardest partiers I knew were Chem majors. I think town and gown relations must be completely revamped if both are to thrive in the coming years. Williamsburg benefits enormously from the College’s presence and the thousands of students pouring money in the city’s economy. It’s ridiculous that Williamsburg then turns around and blatantly discriminates against student housing and nightlife. I wish the College good luck in changing city policies.
And with respect to Wayne’s comment, I do live in the real world and I do think the “Tea-Baggers” were “a bunch of out-of-touch goofs.” As a life-long resident of Massachusetts, I, like Alex, found the demonstrations more like media sponsored events without a historical foundation. The original Boston Tea Party was provoked by taxation without representation. Last I checked, every non-felon US citizen was entitled to vote in the last election. It seems like the Tea Baggers that saw their choices for public office lose and in their disappointment, liken their cause to the Revolution. But it’s an ignorant and unfounded connection, since they currently have representation. The minority party, in a liberal democracy, has rights, but it must also acknowledge the legitimacy of the majority’s power. Undoubtedly the pendulum will swing back at some point, but until then, it’s outrageous to promote Tea Parties when you lose in representative elections.
Good luck next year,
Alumnus