This past week, the city fired the latest volley in the ongoing battle against high-occupancy housing. In a series of letters to fraternity members, city zoning officials made clear their intentions to sue any fraternity that attempted to move from the Units to off campus. For now, at least, it appears these were just warning shots across the bow. Even so, they set an ominous tone for what we can expect from town-gown relations in the coming year.
The City’s argument is that Fraternity houses are prohibited in Williamsburg because they are not explicitly provided for in the city’s code. Sure — but neither are book or gardening clubs, which are, of course, safe from fear of lawsuits. And haven’t student organizations been meeting in off-campus houses for years? Selective law enforcement is sketchy, to say the least.
Even for a city administration which has found few darlings in this student body, this stance is questionable. It is not at all clear how exactly the city plans to distinguish between a fraternity house and a house in which a few fraternity members live. Invariably the two types of houses will share many of the same characteristics, particularly parking and socializing patterns. If these warnings do develop teeth in the coming years, the city may force students into meritless yet expensive lawsuits which will probably only inflame tempers on all sides.
The timing here is very unfortunate. Just last week, the College of William and Mary made some major concessions to the city by agreeing to review its alcohol policy and to sanction students for off-campus transgressions, thus showing it is willing to play ball with the city. While it remains to be seen what comes out of the city’s latest efforts to revise the three-person rule, we continue to call on it to focus on behavior — which generally can be remedied with a noise complaint — rather than restricting the number of people living together in a house or the types of ties that bind them.
If the events of this year have proven anything, it is that the College does not create a sustainable and welcoming environment for the male half of its Greek community. The Units are simply too large for this school’s fraternities, but off-campus housing is ripe with its own complications. We again call on the College to bump up fraternity housing on its list of priorities, and to again consider our suggestion to move fraternities into the Jamestown Road office spaces, which could be relocated to the Dillard complex.

5 Comments
For Williamsburg to sue the
For Williamsburg to sue the College of William and Mary if a fraternity moves off campus appears to be a threat with no legal basis. I believe the city of Williamsburg is opposed to fraternities off-campus because it does not want to have noise from late-night parties that fraternities often have. If implemented, Williamsburg would most likely lose a court case in trying to justify this ruling.
I think stuents generally
I think stuents generally love this college—or at least their fellow students. The admin and the BOV aren’t exactly everyone’s favorites. And everyone who has a brain in the city—including Dr. Haulman and Michelle DeWitt, one of the city’s main financial/economic people—has publicly said that the college and CW are the primary engines of the city. Truth is, William & Mary brings in a couple hundred million in revenue to the city per year. The city does actually need the college-let’s not kid ourselves here.
As long as the school will
As long as the school will not do as most every other non-evangelical school has done— tacitly acknowledge underage drinking as a norm in its alcohol policy— on-campus life will be dead, thereby pushing people off-campus and creating problems with a retirement / tourist community. It’s just pure naivete on the college’s part, and its kind of shocking. Sorry, this probably seems obvious to many of you, just had to say it.
The endowment’s not going to get any better with most every student hating the school.Go look up William and Mary on Urban Dictionary and see how school spirit is doing.
It’s kind of funny— these problems arise because the town doesn’t need the college economically, even though it’s been here for 400 years.
If the alcohol/res life
If the alcohol/res life policy just allowed fraternities to openly host parties on their main floors and in the basements, I guarantee you we would have much less of a problem filling the units. Yes, that’s never going to happen, but it would solve alot of problems.
when i was an udnergrad, i
when i was an udnergrad, i tried to work on getting the jamestown road and richmond road offices turned into residences, but found that they are not zoned to have residential occupants, and many are not structurally sound ot be used as such