Article Tools
Share on Facebook
Seed Newsvine
Send Article
Print

Nearly half of SA bills not executed

7 December 2007 | By Russ Zerbo, Flat Hat Staff Writer | The Flat Hat » news

After the April 16, 2007, shooting at Virginia Tech, Student Assembly senators James Evans ’07 and Ryan Eickel ’10 sponsored the Virginia Tech Condolence Act. The Act “commits all energies now and in the future to aid Virginia Tech in rebuilding the spirits of its student body through dedication to make even these darkest times a learning experience for us all in the value of human life.”

However, both Evans and Eickel neglected to send a letter of condolence to Virginia Tech. When Senate Chairman Matt Beato ’09 contacted Eickel about this over the summer, he replied, “I realize [now] that simply creating a piece of legislation really had no effect, but I myself was still learning about how the senate functions.”

Eickel recently commented on the bill.

“It would have been more meaningful to send a physical copy of the bill to Virginia Tech’s Student Assembly, but this was not our original intent,” he said.

The Virginia Tech Condolence Act was one of 12 bills passed during the senate’s spring session. Six of these bills took no action. Two bills involved spending. Four bills were passed concerning internal affairs.

The We Are All Hokies Act appropriated money for the purchase of memorial wristbands and donated the proceeds to a memorial fund.

So far in this session, 21 bills have been passed. Three of these required no action. Three more were approvals of SA spending.

There have been five bills this session in which an action was called for and the action has been completed.

It should be noted that most of these bills concerned internal affairs and did not need administrative approval.

One bill ensured run-off elections in the event of a tie in an SA election, one allowed graduate students to represent undergraduates in Honor Council proceedings, one restructured two senate committees, one allowed students easier access to law advice and one bill established a $15,000 fund to help register voters.

This leaves 10 passed bills that call for an action which has yet to be fulfilled. Two of these bills were passed last week.

The remaining eight bills require the cooperation of an outside party, with the exception of the Know Your Rights Act, which proposed the distribution of Know Your Rights cards.

Of the remaining seven bills, five are sponsored by Senator Matt Skibiak ’08. The implementation of the Handicap Accessibility Act has been pushed to the spring.

Meetings have begun regarding the Reasonable Exam Time and Pass/Fail Acts, but Skibiak was told by the chairman of the Education Policy Committee that the Pass/Fail Act will likely go nowhere.

“There will be more to come from this,” Skibiak said about the bill. “But since there seems to be less social activities on campus, there hasn’t been much complaining and therefore, not much for me to work with.”

Skibiak also sponsored the Syllabus Availability Act, which proposes the establishment of a website where students can search for class syllabi. A designer has been commissioned to create the site, but it has yet to be finished.

Observers have criticized the current senate for the poor implementation of bills.

“If something is passed in the senate and it doesn’t come to fruition, that’s the responsibility of the entire student assembly,” SA President Zach Pilchen ’09 said.

Beato pointed out that it is difficult for any one senator to accomplish anything.

“My goal is to alleviate this problem of senators not following up on passed and pending legislation, but I am still limited in that at the end of the day I cannot force anyone to do anything,” he said. “The check and balance on SA senators is ultimately the student body in elections.”

A sentence has been removed that incorrectly stated that since the SA restructuring, incumbents, with one exception, have held their seats.

  1. This last sentence is completely untrue. Sasha Eckstein ’08, Victor Sulkowski ’07, Kevin Newton ’07, and Jhett Nelson ’06, in addition to probably others, have all lost their seats.

    In the 2005 elections, for example, widespread dislike of the Senate’s actions led to a 50% or thereabouts incumbency rate, meaning that yes, individual senators can be held accountable. Each term generally begins with about 17 new senators and about 5 old ones.

    I really wish The Flat Hat would follow up on facts like this in the future, given how difficult it is to correct facts that have already been printed.


    — Matt Beato    Dec 7, 09:56 PM    #
  2. I don’t know about those others, but Victor S lost his seat because he got kicked out of W&M, not because of losing an election. Facts make SA ppl sad :(


    — VS got kicked out :(    Dec 7, 10:05 PM    #
  3. No, sir, you are incorrect. Victor, forgive me for speaking for you, but he:

    1) won an election
    2) lost an election
    3) won an election
    4) lost his seat mid-year and I filled in

    Matt is right. Facts make the Flat Hat (and sometimes its commentators) sad.

    The Tech bill in question was a copy of the BOV’s resolution to the same ends. To express solemn solidarity. That kind of act is not about showing off, it’s about reminding us all what really matters.

    Thank you all for letting me know I’ve been mentioned in the FH. Hopefully I will never comment again.


    — James Evans    Dec 7, 11:01 PM    #
  4. I would like more investigative acticles like this in the Flat Hat. Good job Russ Zerbo


    — anon    Dec 8, 01:52 PM    #
  5. Zach Pilchen has told me on a number of occasions about the senate’s almost 100% incumbency rate. My fault.


    — Russ Zerbo    Dec 8, 04:49 PM    #